5.3.14 Evaluation of external reports on AEs and errors Estimated reading: 2 minutes 39 views Authors Purpose and goal Evaluation of cross-institutional reporting registers for events that may also occur in the same or a similar way in one's own organization. Incident reports from other institutions are evaluated at specified intervals (CIRS register, quality register, annual reports from arbitration boards, research, patient surveys, results from self-assessments, etc.). QM-RL:2015 § 4 (1) - Error management and error reporting systems; Part B § 2; DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 and DIN EN 15224:2017 7.1.6 Knowledge of the organization Area of application Authorized body Whole hospital Description The management assigns a position in the organization to evaluate reports on adverse events and errors from other organizations to determine whether they are relevant for the hospital or for individual departments. Employees are requested to forward reports on AEs or errors from other organizations to their departments to the designated unit. The authorized body evaluates report registers for specified periods. It must be checked whether the reported events relate to the hazard situation in the organization. Sources for reports on AEs and errors can be - Reports from the arbitration boards of the medical associations - Individual reports in the specialist press - Individual reports in the general press - Patient surveys - CIRS registers https://www.kritische-ereignisse.de (If the reports are relevant to the organization's sub-areas, employees are notified with suggestions for corrective measures. To the procedural instructions here Download Attachments Risk Surveilliance ReportDownload 5.3 Dealing with risks and opportunities - Previous 5.3.13 Notification of cross-institutional registers Next - 5.3 Dealing with risks and opportunities 5.3.15 Reports on UEs to the management
