5.3.06 Control of non-compliant results Estimated reading: 3 minutes 114 views Authors 1 Purpose and objective Prevent products that are recognised as defective from continuing to be used.edit 2 Scope of application During the entire process.edit 3 Type and scope 3.1 General information Products that do not fulfil the quality requirements may no longer be used. Regulations must be made on labelling, documentation, assessment, segregation, treatment and notification of the bodies concerned. In particular, the responsibility for the assessment of non-conformities and the further handling of the products (e.g. reworking) must be defined. The identification of defective products is not always identical to the testing of products. A distinction must be made between the prevention of further processing, which is all the more annoying as the overall production process has progressed, and delivery to the customer. The error classification should be carried out first for all measures: Only then can the urgency of decisions on how to proceed be assessed. Not all deviations need to trigger an alarm. 3. 2 individual points The following must be regulated how to prevent non-compliant products from being inadvertently reused how non-compliant products are labelled how the non-compliant products are assessed and how the assessment is documented. how the non-compliant products are separated and how they are handled. Scope of testing and categorisation procedure including repeat tests Notification of the bodies concerned Recording of quality costs due to defective products Triggering of corrective measures Notification of the intended use or repair of the defective product to the client or its authorised representative to obtain a special release Records of the actual condition of the accepted fault and of repairs carried out Triggering a recall and considering safety, product liability and customer satisfaction Special case: "Defective product" on acceptance: If defective products (damaged during transport) or damaged packaging have to be accepted, the transport damage must first be checked, identified and documented. The products must be labelled accordingly. The result of the inspection must be communicated to the responsible authorities. This office must then decide on further use. Edit 4 Documentation Errors and deviations are categorised as critical errors, major errors and minor errors. Further handling must be documented Rework (leads to conformity) Repair (requires special approval) Reclassification (for other uses) Warping (scrap) The findings can be documented in quality deviation reports, possibly inspection reports, instructions for repairs, etc. 5 Resources Edit 6 Notes and comments In clinical trials, non-compliance with inclusion/exclusion criteria can result in a "defective product". Or the randomisation code is broken. Or laboratory values are missing because not enough material was available. Overall, this procedure takes into account that a single error does not always render the entire product unusable, but only limits its usefulness. It is therefore important to consider at an early stage how to deal with (often foreseeable) deviations. 7 Responsibilities Who carries out the error classification? Who carries out the inspection and makes the disposition decision? Who reports the occurrence of a faulty product to the management or to the customer? Who downgrades the product? Who authorises the special release? 8 Applicable documents Literature, regulations 8.7 Control of non-conforming results DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 Terms Defective products (nonconforming product) The correct term should actually be "deviating product". What is not meant is the "defective product, which must be sorted out in any case and not allowed to remain in the process". Attachments PDF of the VADownload 5.3 Dealing with risks and opportunities - Previous 5.3.05 Information letter on adverse events Next - 5.3 Dealing with risks and opportunities 5.3.07 Behaviour in the event of a claim